For City Planners, Community Consensus Shouldn't Be the Standard

Upzoned host Abby Kinney, an urban planner in Kansas City, and Strong Towns senior editor Daniel Herriges

Aiming for community consensus when making planning decisions sounds like a noble goal. Yet in practice, says Jeremy Levine in a recent article in Shelterforce, a consensus approach to community participation often supports “elite authority” and the status quo rather than challenges them.

Levine uses an example from the affordable housing debates in the Bay Area, where public meetings were, in effect, “veto points that can block new development.”

New projects generally require community agreement in order to move forward, and so all it takes is a handful of opponents to signal a lack of consensus. By design, then, public meetings give the people who say “no” a much louder voice than the people who say “yes.”

Levine’s article in particular—and community consensus in general—is the subject of this week’s episode of Upzoned. Host Abby Kinney, a planner in Kansas City, and Strong Towns senior editor Daniel Herriges, discuss the ways in which conventional public engagement can actually hurt the planning process. They talk about why asking people where they struggle—not to mention observing firsthand—can yield better results than asking people what they want.  They also discuss why reforming public engagement should go hand in hand with reforming public works.

Then in the Downzone, Daniel recommends The Overstory, a Pulitzer Prize-winning novel about trees that inspires awe, wonder, and even humility in the reader. And Abby is getting ready for Fall with a scary yet thought-provoking film.

Additional Show Notes

• “It’s Time to Move On From Community Consensus,” by Jeremy Levine

• “Stop Asking the Public What They Want,” by Daniel Herriges

• Abby Kinney (Twitter)

• Daniel Herriges (Twitter)

• Gould Evans Studio for City Design

• Theme Music by Kemet the Phantom (Soundcloud)

• Select Strong Towns articles about public engagement

  • “Most Public Engagement Is Worthless,” by Charles Marohn

  • “Most Public Engagement Is Worse than Worthless,” by Ruben Anderson

  • "‘Public engagement’ is about knowing your neighbors, not planning a meeting.” by Rachel Quednau

  • “Don't Leave Your Community's Challenges to the Professionals,” by Rachel Quednau

  • “We Don't Need More ‘Invitations to the Table.’ We Need a New Table.” by Charles Marohn

Cover image via Wikimedia Commons.