Strong Towns
Cart 0
Articles Podcasts Videos About
Become a Member
Local Conversations Crash Analysis Studio Housing-Ready Cities Community Action Lab
Academy Action Lab Cohort Accelerator Housing Trap All Books
Book an Event Attend an Event Local-Motive Tour National Gathering
Cart 0
ArticlesPodcastsVideos Programs Local Conversations Crash Analysis Studio Housing-Ready Cities Community Action Lab Learn Academy Action Lab Cohort Accelerator Housing Trap All Books Events Book an Event Attend an Event Local-Motive Tour National Gathering About
Strong Towns
We support a strong America full of strong cities, towns, and neighborhoods.
Become a Member

Book Review: "Roadways for People" Seeks To Change Transportation Planning

 

Roadways for People, and author Lynn Peterson. (Source: Wikimedia Commons.)

Anyone who has heard the Strong Towns directive to “observe humbly where people are struggling” will be on familiar turf in Roadways for People: Rethinking Transportation Planning and Engineering. Like Strong Towns Founder Charles Marohn, author Lynn Peterson, currently the president of the Oregon Metro Council, calls herself a “recovering” transportation engineer, and, also like him, she was ambivalent about projects she had worked on early in her career and was determined to find a better way.

Peterson’s book (co-authored with Elizabeth Doerr) makes the case for human-centered design, with a more inclusive role for all affected stakeholders, including consulting them much earlier in the process and being cognizant of past planning wrongs when dealing with affected communities.

“While it is our job as transportation professionals to develop potential scenarios that meet technical needs and meet safety guidelines, we must continuously test our assumptions about what our work can represent with the community members who will be utilizing the spaces we help create,” writes Peterson.

Engineers are great at solving engineering problems, Peterson argues, but too often the goals delivered to them omit critical context and community needs. On many road projects,  “community engagement” has just been a box to check for the planning process, with superficial meetings that document residents’ concerns but rarely act on them. Compounding the problem, numerous entities and departments may work on any given transportation project, making communication, aligning goals, and even ethics more challenging. 

Many projects that prove to be harmful were designed to solve one problem (e.g., traffic throughput) while ignoring other adverse effects. Peterson talks about the problem of defining goals, and how engineering speak can obscure real needs or effects. This results in goals for a project such as, “Reduce congestion on mainline highway at interchange X by adding a lane to the northbound off-ramp and improve signals at intersections of the interchange with the local arterial to decrease delay for $25 million.” Run that through a more effective community engagement process, and it might come out with more clearly defined directives, such as “decrease congestion in the northbound direction on the main line during the peak hour,” “increase mobility and accessibility to the surface streets,” and “improve pedestrian and cyclist safety through the interchange area on the surface streets with an emphasis on seniors’ needs.” 

Peterson outlines several mechanisms to capture concerns earlier and more earnestly. She proposes a four-stage process with feedback loops for each phase to prevent erroneous or misplaced directives from advancing to implementation. She starts with “Create Problem Statement,” in which teams listen carefully and test assumptions, then “Re-scope and Test,” which scrutinizes those problem statements. In “Plan and Test,” scenarios and metrics are evaluated, then where design and metrics are finalized in “Design and Test.” Only after these steps, each with an escape hatch to recalibrate, does a project go to implementation. 

Peterson cites some success stories born from a more inclusive process. In Eagle County, Colorado, transportation officials preside over a car-dependent landscape with many high-income homeowners. But much of the workforce at the area’s popular ski resorts lives below the poverty line and needs reliable public transportation to reach their jobs and local services.

Coordinating with as many as 24 local agencies, the county developed an app called Transit Hub, which compiled local public transportation routes and schedules from multiple providers in an easy-to-use and translatable format. They also worked with local ski areas to incorporate schedules of the employee shuttles they run, and even coordinated with local medical centers and agencies to develop a mobile medical bus to serve underprivileged residents. This inclusive process went far beyond what many transportation departments would consider their purview, and produced results that benefitted a wider range of local residents in a cost-effective way.

In another example, a rail tunnel project in Baltimore, planners realized the original goal came from Amtrak to reduce travel times for its trains in the Northeast Corridor. The repair was not optional—the tunnel had reached the end of its functional life—but the planners and engineers sought a much deeper level of community engagement for a project that would be so disruptive to the affected areas. In the end, they came up with a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) that detailed how the neighborhood’s needs would be accounted for in the project, with details for specific mitigation efforts and neighborhood improvements. 

Peterson’s recent career has included working on the controversial Rose Quarter Improvement Project in Portland, Oregon. The construction of Interstate 5 in Oregon was one of several downtown highways constructed through a historically Black neighborhood in the 20th century. Transportation officials are now grappling with how to make transportation improvements in the city, while also mitigating and rectifying the historic harms inflicted by the creation of the highway. Peterson writes compellingly of the responsibilities of planners and engineers on this issue, which Strong Towns has covered with recent civil rights challenges to highway projects in Houston and Cincinnati. 

Roadways for People offers an important reminder of a phrase commonly bandied about in government and planning circles: “communities aren’t places, they are people.”

 

 
You May Also Like
Pedestrian Deaths Are Still Way Too High—Here's What Needs to Change
Asia Mieleszko
May 6, 2025
Pedestrian Deaths Are Still Way Too High—Here's What Needs to Change
Asia Mieleszko
May 6, 2025

A new report shows pedestrian deaths dropped in 2024. But this “good news” comes with a huge asterisk: they're still 50% higher than they were a decade ago.

Asia Mieleszko
May 6, 2025
One Brooklyn Pizzeria’s Battle in the War Against Outdoor Dining
Asia Mieleszko
Apr 2, 2025
One Brooklyn Pizzeria’s Battle in the War Against Outdoor Dining
Asia Mieleszko
Apr 2, 2025

NYC loved outdoor dining until it didn't. When 13,000 restaurants were forced to dismantle their sheds, one Brooklyn pizzeria found a workaround.

Asia Mieleszko
Apr 2, 2025
How Car Sharing Can Make Your Community Stronger
Emma Durand-Wood
May 30, 2024
How Car Sharing Can Make Your Community Stronger
Emma Durand-Wood
May 30, 2024

Car-sharing gives people the perks of a private vehicle without the hassles of owning one, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. Here's how urbanists can use this car-rental model to strengthen their communities.

Emma Durand-Wood
May 30, 2024
 

 
Featured
Ben Abramson
Ben Abramson

Ben Abramson is a Staff Writer at Strong Towns. In his career as a travel journalist with The Washington Post and USA TODAY, Ben has visited many destinations that show how Americans were once world-class at building appealing, prosperous places at a human scale. He has also seen the worst of the suburban development pattern, and joined Strong Towns because of its unique way of framing the problems we can all see and intuit, and focusing on local, achievable solutions. A native of Washington, DC, Ben lives in Venice, Florida; summers in Atlantic Canada; and loves hiking, biking, kayaking, and beachcombing.

 
Top StoryBen AbramsonApril 26, 2023traffic engineering, books, public engagement, community engagement, people centered places, safe and productive streets, engineers
Facebook0 Twitter LinkedIn0 0 Likes
Previous

Can Expanding Roads Solve Homelessness?

Top StoryMichel Durand-WoodApril 26, 2023transportation spending, active transportation, transit, canada, highways, highway spending, freeway widening, economic growth, end highway expansion, homeless
Next

Upzoning Might Not Lower Housing Costs. Do It Anyway.

Herriges, Top StoryDaniel HerrigesApril 26, 2023Incremental Housing, upzoning, zoning, housing cost, housing affordability, rent, renters, housing crisis, housing, housing policy
 

Helping cities, towns and neighborhoods take local action to grow safe, livable and financially resilient.

 

Get Involved

Become a Member
Sign Up for Emails
Pitch a Story
RSS Feed

Resources

Books
Action Lab
Blog Roll
Shop
Press

About

About Us
Team | Board
Employment
Contact Us

Site

Privacy Policy
Comment Policy
FAQ
Search

Each month, this website is funded by Strong Towns members.

Join the movement to keep the message going.
Become a Member

Strong Towns is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Our work is performed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Please share with others to use for good.

 
Strong Towns
1511 Northern Pacific Rd,
Brainerd, MN, 56401
8442181681 linda@strongtowns.org
Hours