How do we minimize the chance that our best intentions will go awry and leave everybody worse off? Let’s set these 3 ground rules.
Read MoreIt’s possible to grow and accumulate wealth…but not without intention. That starts with asking the right question. "How do we get more money for infrastructure?" is the wrong question.
Read MoreThe most important thing for a local government is to avoid ruin.
Read MoreThe most important thing for a local government is to avoid ruin.
Read MoreHere's how one strong citizen approaches the home buying process.
Read MoreLocal governments have a moral duty to pursue growth and investment strategies that have no chance of blowing up.
Read MoreHow does a city balance the expectations of drivers with the needs of productive places and the people who use them, when fast-paced technological change may soon upend the basic realities on which such assessments are built?
Read MoreWe never calculate—let alone track—the public's actual return-on-investment (dollars in versus dollars out over multiple life cycles) when we do a project. We never even ask the question.
Read MoreYes, many thriving places have attractive lawn furniture, tasteful signage, and abundant flowers. But adding those items to a place with fundamental flaws is just lipstick on a pig.
Read MoreReintroducing some risk, or rather, making the risk that is already there more evident, may be the best thing we can do to help re-build a culture where small mistakes don’t have devastating consequences.
Read MoreNot only do small downtown shops provide a higher rate of tax revenue than big box stores; they're also a much lower risk investment for the community.
Read MoreMaybe we're doing it wrong.
Read MoreA diversity of transportation options has recognized and measurable value. If one link fails (a bridge collapse, a sinkhole, a major crash, etc.) and is closed, others can pick up the burden.
Read MoreA twisted look at the twisted federal transportation bill.
Read MoreHow many fender benders equals one life?
Read MoreTexting while driving is a very real problem. The cause of the problem, however, isn’t recklessness but an incorrect perception of safety on behalf of drivers who feel little risk in texting. We can write all the anti-distracted driving laws we want but, at best, we will only displace the problem, replacing texting with some other distraction. To really address this problem, we need to be willing to incorporate driver psychology, including risk response, into our engineering approach.
Read More