In walkable cities, it’s not hard to find a solution if you find yourself stranded. But what about in a car-dependent place?
Read MoreGalesburg, IL, is talking about Strong Towns ideas, centered around a question that many Strong Towns readers are familiar with: “Is our downtown built for cars instead of people?”
Read MoreWith a baby on the way, I’ve been lectured multiple times about safe car seats, and heard nothing about how to minimize the most dangerous activity people do with their children: drive.
Read MoreThis Not Just Bikes video takes a look at airport business parks as an interesting (and infuriating) case study for places designed for cars instead of people
Read MoreHumans aren’t the only “pedestrians” who benefit from safer, more walkable places.
Read MoreBecause we depend so heavily on cars, what happens when roads become too icy to drive on? The answer: road salt. But there are serious consequences to relying on salt for road-clearing.
Read MoreTechnology historian Peter Norton talks about why we need to be more skeptical toward the utopian promises of self-driving cars.
Read MoreA Studebaker factory once brought jobs to South Bend, IN, but what’s happened to the city (and its infrastructure) now that the factory has closed its doors?
Read MoreAutomated vehicle technology will do nothing to make our streets better places to be.
Read MoreMany college campuses are designed to be walkable and human-scaled. But living in a great neighborhood like that doesn’t have to end at graduation.
Read MoreBig money “pedestrian” projects are often not for pedestrians at all. Their real purpose is to serve faster car traffic.
Read MoreOften lost in debates about whether or not to “subsidize” transit: the total cost of a system in which everyone drives is much higher than the total cost of a system in which other forms of transportation are attractive alternatives.
Read MoreIn a “car place,” pedestrians are grudgingly tolerated. In a “pedestrian place,” cars are allowed to visit. We need a lot more of the latter. Here’s where to start.
Read MoreGetting yourself from Point A to Point B in your city shouldn’t require 100-square-feet of space.
Read MoreWe’ve long accepted a base level of carnage on our streets. But we should stop describing these as random “accidents.” They are the inevitable outcome of our chosen approach to building cities.
Read MoreWe want to dismiss Detroit as an anomaly. But in fact Detroit is a glimpse into the future for nearly every American city and town. Increasingly fragile from auto-centric development, for Detroit—and for the rest of us—it was only a matter of time.
Read MoreWhat exactly is the “human scale”? And have you ever thought about just how little of the public space in your city is designed at that scale—even in places you think of as walkable?
Read MoreAutomated vehicle technology will do nothing to make our streets better places to be.
Read MoreThe physical design of the modern public realm, with its emphasis on speedy efficiency, advances a dehumanizing tendency. It undermines the opportunity to be a neighbor.
Read MoreWhy stake our hopes on a technology that’s still far from ready for mass adoption? Building walkable cities, where jobs, goods and services are closer together, is a much surer, cheaper, less resource-intensive path to sustainability.
Read More