The Standard Approach vs. the Strong Towns Approach

We started Strong Towns because we realized that the standard approach to growth and development was not working. We know there is a better way—a way to build our cities that cultivates community wealth, not debt and bankruptcy; a way to build our places that responds to the needs of the people, not the desires of distant decision makers; a way to take small steps and test out ideas, instead of going all in on expensive projects.

Put simply, here's the difference between the standard approach and the Strong Towns approach:

Which would you choose for your town?

Related stories

Featured
What an Old Bus Terminal Can Teach Us About Building a Strong Town
Ben Abramson
What an Old Bus Terminal Can Teach Us About Building a Strong Town
Ben Abramson

Some of the best arguments for historic preservation are not aesthetic or sentimental, but economic. Here are some examples of how the preservation and reuse of historic buildings can increase an area’s productivity.

Ben Abramson
How Creative Design Can Turn Strict Zoning Codes Into Success Stories
Edward Erfurt
How Creative Design Can Turn Strict Zoning Codes Into Success Stories
Edward Erfurt

Regulatory reform doesn’t always mean replacing or changing zoning codes. Great designers are experts at working within existing codes to increase housing options, and this method is often more attainable and scalable than actually changing the code. Here’s one such example of using existing code to create incremental housing.

Edward Erfurt
Lessons on Development Patterns From America’s Oldest Planned City
Edward Erfurt
Lessons on Development Patterns From America’s Oldest Planned City
Edward Erfurt

The unique planning and eclectic architecture of Savannah, GA, provide a PhD education on urban design—but there are also cautionary tales about development to be gleaned from this historic city.

Edward Erfurt
Top StoryStrong Towns