It’s pretty easy to destroy a walkable place. We’ve been doing it for so long.
Read MoreYou cannot build a place of enduring value that isn't homey, that isn't loved.
Read MoreI ran the numbers and made a plan for building a traditional urban neighborhood. It turns out there's big profit to be made in this model.
Read MoreThese places all have many of the physical elements needed for success, quite frankly, because they were built for it originally. What they need most is people; people that care about the place and have the energy to make it better.
Read MoreSuburbia cannot and will not be retrofitted to a substantially different model of development. But a small portion may be salvageable.
Read MoreChuck Marohn responds to critiques of his essay, Sprawl is not the Problem.
Read MoreI encourage you all to stop using the word sprawl. It doesn't accurately describe the problem, it prevents us from getting to real responses and it unnecessarily divides the national dialog in ways that are unhelpful.
Read MoreAmerica's pre-Depression development pattern relied on exploitation of workers, poor living conditions and exclusion of women and minorities from power in order to function. How is the Strong Towns approach, which advocates for traditional development patterns, different?
Read MoreWorking from the top down, with efficiency as our greatest value, we can bring about great change in a short time with limited resources. What we give up with that approach is resiliency.
Read MoreWe've reconfigured our public spaces to accommodate the automobile. Today we need the humility to acknowledge that our ancestors -- who built in the traditional style -- may have known what they were doing.
Read More